page top


Add to bookbag Add to Bookbag | Bookbag (0)

Item Description

Title: Letter from THOMAS WILLIAM SILLOWAY to GEORGE PERKINS MARSH, dated June 23, 1858.


  • Silloway, Thomas William, 1828-1910


  • Marsh, George Perkins, 1801-1882

Source Document

Extent: 1 letter

Genre(s): letter



Note [Digital Version]

, Center for Digital Initiatives, University of Vermont Libraries

Type of Resource: text

Parent Collections

Other Formats

Access Conditions

For usage rights related to this resource please visit:
More information.

Permanent Link:

Preferred citation

Letter from THOMAS WILLIAM SILLOWAY to GEORGE PERKINS MARSH, dated June 23, 1858., Original located at the University of Vermont's Special Collections in the George Perkins Marsh Collection, filed by date., (accessed January 24, 2018)


Transcribed by : Ellen M. Thomson and Ralph H. Orth

TEI mark-up by : James P. Tranowski andEllen Thomson

Published by: University of Vermont. All rights reserved.

Publication Information

Boston June 23..1858

Mr. Marsh My Dear Sir. I learn that a project is on foot to have you invited to Montpelier to endorse a dome that is to be drawn out full size on the Hall over the depot. Some time ago I informed you, that amendments were proposed by Mr Richards. As near as I can learn, he and Powers are now at it, trying to fix the thing up to suit them. They are in great trouble to get the thing as they want it. Not content to take my drawings, and let them be executed they are attempting to alter the sweep or rise. I made this assertion for the following reasons. 1st. I made with my own hands every drawing for the work in full, with every detail full size. I made them precisely like the perspective. 2d, I have it from Head quarters that Richards found fault with the size and sweep -------------------------------- Page -------------------------------- of the dome as drawn, and 3rd, no necessity existing for any new or different drawings, it must be that they propose alterations or they would use the drawings I have made. Richard struck the whole out as he wanted it, Powers did'nt like it. Then he amended it, and it did not suit, finaly his time at M. having expired he took the matter home with him and is to make a new one and go up with it. Now that dome as drawn and approved by you must be built. The working drawings will produce it. So many amendents have been suggested by Powers that some of the figures on the section may be wrong. He had promised me to correct them. The truth is as much as he may pretend to want it like the original he does not mean to have it so else he would do it and that without trouble, for even if he did not use my drawings -------------------------------- Page -------------------------------- Richards or some one else could make new ones to work by. The truth is they intend to ament it, and under the delusive plan of getting your opinion amp;c. they propose to consult you. If you permit them to do anything but follow the perspective and my working drawings, unless they copy them you will be deceived. It is quite possible they may not consult you still that is said to be the project now. If they get any new thing endorsed by you that will open the door for all the amendments they desire. Reports also say that Powers has triumphed over you on the patching of the stone columns. He said he would do it and unless you are decided he will. The people who visit this city from Vermont to a man protest against that botching. Powers has been advised by Richards to reject all my framing of the large dome trusses, new ones are being made. Something more than $100 up to day before yesterday had been expended on the new work for labor alone. These very trusses were considered by eminent master builders -------------------------------- Page -------------------------------- of this city to be of so much value that by actual petition I was induced to publish them as one of the plates of my new book. The master builder, and Mr. Andrews the contractor boath of them are ready to testify before any committee that those rejected are in their opinions much superior in strength to the new ones. No one was consulted but Richards. Now if this is the case, depend upon it the new trusses will not support that heavy dome. Those drawn were made from actual calculation of the strength of timber, the strains exerted amp;c. These builders at M. pronounce the new ones inferior. Am I to be responsible for these things? How easy it would have been (had Powers been a man at all competent for his place he would have done so) to have put one of my trusses together on the ground, block up the ends and then load it with some of those granite blocks if need be till it broke. Hundreds of dollars have been now wasted, by the ignorence of Powers and the unprincipledness of R. whose business it is to get the state into new expenses by rejecting my work. The whole of the outside of that building is my own if I discover that Powers varies in the least I will publish a full statement of his deeds.

I am yours truly Thomas W. Silloway

Add a comment:


* Optional

User Comments